<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 112 construction firms accused of bid rigging &#8211; but why should it be illegal to share bidding costs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.contractstore.com/2008/04/17/112-construction-forms-accused-of-bid-rigging-but-is-it-necessarily-illegal-to-share-bidding-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.contractstore.com/2008/04/17/112-construction-forms-accused-of-bid-rigging-but-is-it-necessarily-illegal-to-share-bidding-costs/</link>
	<description>Legal News And Tips For Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:06:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Frankel</title>
		<link>http://blog.contractstore.com/2008/04/17/112-construction-forms-accused-of-bid-rigging-but-is-it-necessarily-illegal-to-share-bidding-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Frankel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.contractstore.com/2008/04/17/112-construction-forms-accused-of-bid-rigging-but-is-it-necessarily-illegal-to-share-bidding-costs/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>All bidders could be paid by the client to bid.  The amount should be enough to pay the bidder for all expenses to bid plus a sum to encourage bids.  I dont think this is illegal, yet it would be transparent and cover pricing would be unnecessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All bidders could be paid by the client to bid.  The amount should be enough to pay the bidder for all expenses to bid plus a sum to encourage bids.  I dont think this is illegal, yet it would be transparent and cover pricing would be unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
